Modeling Advanced Electronic Device Characterization Using a Unified Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework

Authors

  • Ebrahim E. Elsayed Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt. Email: engebrahem16@gmail.com , engebrahem16@std.mans.edu.eg Author
  • Mohammed R. Hayal Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt. Email: mohammedraisan@gmail.com ; mohammedraisan@std.mans.edu.eg Author
  • Davron Aslonqulovich Juraev Scientific Research Center, Baku Engineering University, Baku, AZ0102, Azerbaijan. Email: djuraev@beu.edu.az , juraevdavron12@gmail.com Author
  • Jo‘shqin Shakirovich Abdullayev Department of Physics and Chemistry, TIIAME National Research University (The Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers), Tashkent, 100000, Uzbekistan. Email: j.sh.abdullayev6@gmail.com ; Abdullayev.j@uzsci.net Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71426/jasm.v1.i1.pp9-18

Keywords:

Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML), Semiconductor device modeling, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), Compact models, TCAD surrogate modeling, Nanosheet FETs

Abstract

Advancements in nanoscale semiconductor technologies, wide-bandgap materials, and emerging 2D devices have significantly increased the complexity of device characterization, making traditional TCAD simulations and compact modeling increasingly time-consuming and insufficiently flexible. Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) offers a promising pathway by integrating physical laws with data-driven modeling to enhance accuracy, interpretability, and generalization. This paper presents a unified PIML framework for advanced electronic device characterization that embeds semiconductor transport physics, electrostatic constraints, and compact-model priors directly into neural architectures and loss functions. The proposed approach leverages hybrid PINN-based solvers, residual-learning compact models, and uncertainty-aware training to model I–V, C–V, and RF characteristics across nanosheet FETs, GaN HEMTs, and 2D-material THz transistors. Experimental results demonstrate that PIML models reduce prediction error by up to 35% compared to purely data-driven models and achieve substantially improved physical consistency, particularly in charge conservation and monotonic device behavior. Moreover, the differentiable structure of the framework enables efficient inverse design and parameter extraction, significantly accelerating device optimization workflows. Overall, the study establishes physics-informed ML as a scalable and robust methodology for next-generation electronic device modeling, bridging the gap between high-fidelity physics solvers and fast, design-oriented surrogate models.

References

[1] Kim B, Shin M. A Novel Neural-Network Device Modeling Based on Physics-Informed Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2023 Nov;70(11):6021–6025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2023.3316635

[2] Li R, Lee E, Luo T. Physics-informed deep learning for solving coupled electron and phonon Boltzmann transport equations. Physical Review Applied. 2023 Jun;19(6):064049. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.064049

[3] Liu Y, Li H, Jin JM. Physics-informed machine learning for the efficient modeling of high-frequency devices. IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques. 2024;10:28–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JMMCT.2024.3502062

[4] Craig DL, Moon H, Fedele F, Lennon DT, Van Straaten B, Vigneau F, et al. Bridging the Reality Gap in Quantum Devices with Physics-Aware Machine Learning. Physical Review X. 2024 Jan 4;14(1). Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11285

[5] Wang J, Liu C, You S, Wang D, Cao M. Physics-guided machine learning assisted characteristic prediction and optimization of p-GaN gate HEMTs. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields. 2025 Jul;38(4):e70081. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.70081

[6] Craig DL, Moon H, Fedele F, Lennon DT, Van Straaten B, Vigneau F, et al. Bridging the Reality Gap in Quantum Devices with Physics-Aware Machine Learning. Physical Review X. 2024 Jan 4;14(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011001

[7] Kim Y, Myung S, Ryu J, Jeong C, Kim DS. Physics-augmented neural compact model for emerging device technologies. In: 2020 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD); Kobe, Japan; 2020. p.257–260. IEEE. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9241638

[8] Varanasi A, Degraeve R, Roussel PJ, Vici A, Merckling C. Physics-informed machine learning to analyze oxide defect-induced RTN in gate leakage current. In: 2024 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS); 2024 Mar. p.1–7. IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS48228.2024.10529341

[9] Singhal A, Pahwa G, Agarwal H. A Novel Physics Aware ANN-Based Framework for BSIM-CMG Model Parameter Extraction. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2024 May;71(5):3307–3314. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10492866

[10] Khusro A, Husain S, Hashmi M. Optimized Machine Learning-Augmented Hybrid Empirical Models for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: A Comprehensive Analysis. IEEE Access. 2025;13:136483–136504. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3594339

[11] Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2019 Feb;378:686–707. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

[12] Lu L, Jin P, Karniadakis GE. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2021 Mar;3(3):218–229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00302-5

[13] Guo G, You H, Li C, Tang Z, Li O. A Physics-Informed automatic neural network generation framework for emerging device modeling. Micromachines. 2023 May 29;14(6):1150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061150

[14] Li M, Irsoy O, Cardie C, Xing HG. Physics-Inspired neural networks for efficient device compact modeling. IEEE Journal on Exploratory Solid-State Computational Devices and Circuits. 2016 Dec 1;2:44–49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JXCDC.2016.2636161

[15] Wang J, Kim YH, Ryu J, Jeong C, Choi W, Kim D. Artificial Neural Network-Based compact Modeling Methodology for advanced transistors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 2021 Jan 15;68(3):1318–1325. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9325569

[16] Kao MY, Kam H, Hu C. Deep-learning-assisted physics-driven MOSFET current-voltage modeling. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 2022 May;43(5):722–725. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2022.3168243

[17] Hirtz T, Huurman S, Tian H, Yang Y, Ren TL. Framework for TCAD augmented machine learning on multi-I–V characteristics using convolutional neural network and multiprocessing. Journal of Semiconductors. 2021 Dec;42(12):124101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/124101

[18] Park C, Vincent P, Chong S, Park J, Cha YS, Cho H. Hierarchical mixture-of-experts approach for neural compact modeling of MOSFETs. Solid-State Electronics. 2023 Jan;199:108500. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2022.108500

[19] Mehta K, Wong HY. Prediction of FinFET Current-Voltage and Capacitance-Voltage Curves Using Machine Learning With Autoencoder. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 2021 Feb;42(2):206–209. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9294130

[20] Jeong H, Woo S, Choi J, Cho H, Kim Y, Kong JT, Kim S. Fast and expandable ANN-based compact model and parameter extraction for emerging transistors. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society. 2023 Feb 20;11:153–160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2023.3246477

[21] Liu C, Wang J, You S, Wang D, Yu Z. Machine-learning-assisted EEHEMT compact modeling of GaN HEMTs. Microelectronics Journal. 2025 Aug 29;165:106861. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2025.106861

[22] Woo S, Jeong H, Choi J, Cho H, Kong JT, Kim S. Machine-Learning-Based compact modeling for Sub-3-NM-Node emerging transistors. Electronics. 2022 Sep 1;11(17):2761. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11172761

[23] Abdullayev JS, Sapaev IB, Abdullayev JS, Juraev DA, Jalalov MJ, Elsayed EE. Mathematical Modeling of incomplete ionization in radial P-SI/N-GAAS Heterojunctions: Temperature and doping effects. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2025 Sep 19;54(11):10484–10492. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-025-12391-8

[24] Abdullayev J, Sapaev IB. Factors Influencing the Ideality Factor of Semiconductor p-n and p-i-n Junction Structures at Cryogenic Temperatures. East European Journal of Physics. 2024 Dec 8;(4):329–333. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2024-4-37

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

[1]
E. E. Elsayed, Mohammed R. Hayal, Davron Aslonqulovich Juraev, and Jo‘shqin Shakirovich Abdullayev, “Modeling Advanced Electronic Device Characterization Using a Unified Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework”, Journal of Applied Sciences and Modelling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–18, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.71426/jasm.v1.i1.pp9-18.