Effects of Tillage Types on Soil Chemical Properties, Growth and Yield of Arachis hypogaea L (Groundnut)

Authors

  • Precious Emmanuel Akwa Ibom State University image/svg+xml , Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akwa-Ibom State University, Oruk Anam 530101, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria. Author
  • Okon Udo Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akwa-Ibom State University, Oruk Anam 530101, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71426/jasm.v2.i1.pp114-119

Keywords:

Soil chemical properties, Tillage, Growth and yield, Groundnut.

Abstract

The study purpose was to determine the effect of tillage types: Flat till (FT), Mound till (MT) and Ridge till (RT) on the chemical properties, growth and yield of groundnut. The research was executed in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) to ascertain the effect of tillage types on soil chemical properties. Plant height, leaf area, weight (Fresh/Dry) and number of leaves were measured and subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and treatment means were compared using FLSD (Fisher’s Least Significant Difference). The results revealed that the different tillage types significantly improved soil pH 5.03 (FT), OM 3.25% (MT), AvP 23.73mg/kg (FT) and BS 77.79% (RT), CEC 7.31cmol/kg (RT), and N 0.22 (MT). The study established that sandy soils with poor soil organic matter and leaching of nitrate below the rooting depth were the reason for the low total N content after harvest, with a mean value of 12 (leaf area), RT had the highest leaf area, 16.83 (no branches) and 52.92 (Plant height) compared to FT and MT. The highest yield observed was 0.28kg plant-1 (flat till), compared to 0.27kg plant-1 (ridge till), and 0.20kg plant-1 (MT) and there was a significant difference between tillage types (P <0.05). This study showed that flat tillage significantly improved the growth and yield of groundnut, while tillage types significantly enhanced chemical properties except  nitrogen.

References

[1] Fasinmirin JT, Olorunfemi IE. Pedotransfer Functions for the Prediction of Soil Hydraulic Properties in Ekiti State, Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Technology. 2015;6(2). Available from: https://journals.futa.edu.ng/home/paperd/343/31/10

[2] Afu SM, Isong IA, Awaogu CE. Agricultural potentials of floodplain soils with contrasting parent material in Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2019;25(1):13-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v25i1.3

[3] Ahmed W, Qaswar M, Jing H, Wenjun D, Geng S, Kailou L, Ying M, Ao T, Mei S, Chao L, Yongmei X. Tillage practices improve rice yield and soil phosphorus fractions in two typical paddy soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2020;20(2):850-861. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02468-3

[4] Mark IF. A COMPARISON OF SOIL CHARACTERISTICS UNDER DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS IN A COASTAL PLAIN SAND SOILS OF AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA. Nigerian Journal Of Agricultural Technology (NJAT). 2024;20. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Otobong-Essien-2/publication/384285918

[5] Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X. Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn-Soybean Rotations. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2005;34(2):437-445. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0437

[6] Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM. Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters Second Edition. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin. 2009;408. Available from: http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Documents/P_Methods2ndEdition2009.pdf

[7] Bhatt R, Hossain A, Singh P. Scientific interventions to improve land and water productivity for climate-smart agriculture in South Asia. In: Agronomic Crops: Volume 2: Management Practices. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 499-558. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9783-8_24

[8] Kay BD, VandenBygaart AJ. Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil and Tillage Research. 2002;66(2):107-118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00019-3

[9] Khan MZ, Akhtar ME, Safdar MN, Mahmood MM, Ahmad S, Ahmed N. Effect of source and level of potash on yield and quality of potato tubers. Pak. J. Bot. 2010;42(5):3137-3145. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sagheer-Ahmad-5/publication/283340771_Effect_of_source_and_level_of_potash_on_yield_and_quality_of_potato_tubers/links/56347f2408ae75884113499a/Effect-of-source-and-level-of-potash-on-yield-and-quality-of-potato-tubers.pdf

[10] Caires EF, Barth G, Garbuio FJ. Lime application in the establishment of a no-till system for grain crop production in Southern Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research. 2006;89(1):3-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.06.006

[11] Onwuka MI, Ozurumba UV, Nkwocha OS. Changes in soil pH and exchangeable acidity of selected parent materials as influenced by amendments in South East of Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2016;4(5):80-88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.45008

[12] KETTLEWELL PS. Sugar Beet, ed. A. P. Draycott. xxi+474 pp. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd (2006). The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2007;145(1):95-95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960600671X

[13] Alama IS, Collins E, Nduka EF, Oba AS. Physicochemical and pedological features of swampland soils and productive potentials within a coastal system in Akwa-Ibom State. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB). 2021;19(2):217-229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/19.2.217-229

[14] Grossman RB, Reinsch TG. 2.1 Bulk Density and Linear Extensibility. In: Soil Science Society of America Book Series. 2002. p. 201-228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c9

[15] Nel T, Hardie AG, Clarke CE. SSimple and Multivariate Linear Regression Models for pH Conversion Between Measurement Techniques. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2022;53(14):1797-1808. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2063324

[16] Jabro JD, Stevens WB, Evans RG, Iversen WM. Tillage effects on physical properties in two soils of the Northern Great Plains. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2009;25(3):377-382. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26889

[17] Karki KB, Sherchan DP, Panday D, Ghimire R. Soil fertility and nutrient management. In: The soils of Nepal. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 111-126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80999-7_9

[18] Vasudevan D, Bruland GL, Torrance BS, Upchurch VG, MacKay AA. pH-dependent ciprofloxacin sorption to soils: interaction mechanisms and soil factors influencing sorption. Geoderma. 2009;151(3-4):68-76. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.007

[19] Ramamoorthi V, Meena S. Quantification of soil organic carbon-Comparison of wet oxidation and dry combustion methods. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(10):146-154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.016

[20] Kiniry JR, Simpson CE, Schubert AM, Reed JD. Peanut leaf area index, light interception, radiation use efficiency, and harvest index at three sites in Texas. Field Crops Research. 2005;91(2-3):297-306. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.021

[21] Tripathi RP, Sharma P, Singh S. Influence of tillage and crop residue on soil physical properties and yields of rice and wheat under shallow water table conditions. Soil and Tillage Research. 2007;92(1-2):221-226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.008

[22] Kwiatkowski CA, Harasim E, Klikocka-Wiśniewska O. Effect of Catch Crops and Tillage Systems on the Content of Selected Nutrients in Spring Wheat Grain. Agronomy. 2022;12(5):1054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051054

[23] Brezinščak L, Bogunović I, Plavšin I, Drenjančević L, Andrijanić Z. The influence of reduced and conventional tillage and mulch systems on the yield and agronomic properties of spring wheat. Agronomic Bulletin: Bulletin of the Croatian Agronomic Society. 2022;84(1-2):15-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33128/ag.84.1-2.2

[24] Kumar HV, Salakinkop SR. Growth analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) as influenced by Foliar nutrition. Legume Research. 2017;40(6):1072-1077. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3439

[25] Sohail S, Ansar M, Skalicky M, Wasaya A, Soufan W, Ahmad Yasir T, El-Shehawi AM, Brestic M, Sohidul Islam M, Ali Raza M, EL Sabagh A. Influence of tillage systems and cereals-legume mixture on fodder yield, quality and net returns under rainfed conditions. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):2172. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2172

[26] Meena RS, Meena VS, Meena SK, Verma JP. The needs of healthy soils for a healthy world. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;102:560-561. Available from: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.045

[27] Özcan M, Seven S. Physıcal and chemıcal analysıs and fatty acıd composıtıon of peanut, peanut oıl and peanut butter from ÇOM and NC-7 cultıvars. Grasas y Aceites. 2003;54(1):12-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2003.v54.i1.270

[28] Maiangwa MG, Ogungbile AO. Seed Varieties And Quantities Of Chemical Fertilizers Used In Agricultural Production in Northern Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008;7(1):71-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/gjass.v7i1.2364

[29] Okalebo JR, Gathua KW, Woomer PL. Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis: A Working Manual. 2nd ed. Nairobi: TSB-CIAT and Sacred Africa. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=5882f0c8ed99e15dce797d03&assetKey=AS%3A452837697167361%401484976328229

[30] Baba BM, Isa Z, Abdussalam AF, Abu-Hanifa B. Modelling the signature of human influence on vegetation dynamic in Kamuku National Park, Nigeria. Science World Journal. 2022;17(2):234-247. Available from: https://scienceworldjournal.org/article/view/22939

[31] Uzoho BU, Irokwe IF. Micronutrient Status of Grain Size Fractions in Soils of Land Uses in Mbano, Southeastern, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science. 2022;32(1):37-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.67042/njss.2022.f8ss2tqd

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

[1]
P. Emmanuel and O. Udo, “Effects of Tillage Types on Soil Chemical Properties, Growth and Yield of Arachis hypogaea L (Groundnut)”, Journal of Applied Sciences and Modelling, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 114–119, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.71426/jasm.v2.i1.pp114-119.