Hybrid Post-Quantum Secure Wireless Healthcare Network with Audit Logging and AI-Based Intrusion Detection

Authors

  • Sunnam Veera Venkata Ravi Teja M. Tech (2024-26), Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Adikavi Nannaya University, Rajamahendravaram, 533101, India. Author
  • D. Latha Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Adikavi Nannaya University College of Engineering, Rajamahendravaram, 533101, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71426/jcdt.v2.i2.pp193-206

Keywords:

Post-Quantum Cryptography, Wireless Body Area Network, Blockchain Audit Logging, Intrusion Detection, Random Forest, Healthcare Security.

Abstract

Remote patient monitoring over Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) continuously transports physiological measurements such as heart rate, SpO₂, blood pressure and temperature over wireless links that may be exposed to eavesdropping, replay, manipulation, injection and flooding attacks. Long-lived healthcare records also require protection against future quantum attacks on classical public-key mechanisms. This work presents a hybrid security framework that combines NIST-standardized ML-KEM for post-quantum key encapsulation, ML-DSA for digital signatures, AES-256-GCM for authenticated encryption, HMAC-SHA256 for packet-level integrity verification, a blockchain-inspired hash-chained audit ledger for tamper evidence, and a Random Forest intrusion detection subsystem for behavioral anomaly detection. The prototype integrates a Python TCP gateway, SQLite-based storage with role-based access control, a Streamlit clinician dashboard, and a React/Node.js web client. Functional evaluation covers six security test scenarios involving valid traffic, ciphertext manipulation, replay, signature forgery, malformed input, and packet flooding. The reported prototype measurements are 452 ms for ML-KEM key generation, 318 ms for ML-DSA key generation, 94 μs for AES-256-GCM encryption of a 512-byte payload, 88 ms average gateway processing time, 147 ms end-to-end latency, 342 packets/s sustained throughput, 96% packet delivery ratio, 87% five-class IDS accuracy, and 100% verified audit-chain integrity. A supplementary Random Forest experiment on the BLEWBAN dataset achieved 76.9% accuracy for twelve-class sensor-position classification. The study explicitly distinguishes functional prototype results from production security claims and identifies limitations related to the PQC backend, synthetic attack traffic, hardware platform, scalability and formal security analysis.

References

[1] Reetha. SmartBio: An AI-enabled smart medical device for early cancer detection using variational autoencoders and multimodal sensor integration. Journal of Modern Technology. 2025;2(1):292–301. Available from: https://doi.org/10.71426/jmt.v2.i1.pp292-301

[2] Mogili VB. Designing trustworthy AI in healthcare: Experiences with copilot agents, agentic models, and RAG integration. IPHO Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering. 2026;4(2):19–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18851338

[3] Patel R, Pothireddy SR, Sharma N. Scalable and secure cloud architectures for IoT-enabled healthcare systems. In: Proceedings of the 2026 2nd International Conference on Big Data & Machine Learning (ICBDML). IEEE; 2026. p. 1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDML68582.2026.11544363

[4] Usman M, Asghar MR, Ansari IS, Qaraqe M. Security in wireless body area networks: From in-body to off-body communications. IEEE Access. 2018;6:58064–58074. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2873825

[5] Wang J, Tabassum AT, Li JP. Systematic survey on data security in wireless body area networks in IoT healthcare system. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024;11:1422911. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1422911

[6] Jiang Q, Ma J, Yang C, Ma X, Shen J, Chaudhry SA. Efficient end-to-end authentication protocol for wearable health monitoring systems. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2017;63:182–195. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.03.016

[7] Avanzi R, Bos J, Ducas L, Kiltz E, Lepoint T, Lyubashevsky V, et al. Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard. NIST FIPS 203; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203

[8] Avanzi R, Bos J, Ducas L, Kiltz E, Lepoint T, Lyubashevsky V, et al. Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard. NIST FIPS 204; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204

[9] Bos J, Ducas L, Kiltz E, Lepoint T, Lyubashevsky V, Schanck JM, et al. CRYSTALS-Kyber: A CCA-secure module-lattice-based KEM. In: Proceedings of the IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE; 2018. p. 353–367. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00032

[10] Ducas L, Kiltz E, Lepoint T, Lyubashevsky V, Schwabe P, Seiler G, et al. CRYSTALS-Dilithium: A lattice-based digital signature scheme. IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems. 2018;2018(1):238–268. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2018.i1.238-268

[11] Dworkin MJ. Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC. NIST Special Publication 800-38D. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2007. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-38D

[12] Krawczyk H, Eronen P. HMAC-Based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF). RFC 5869. Internet Engineering Task Force; 2010. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5869

[13] Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

[14] Chandra B, S KSR. Security in wireless body area network (WBAN) using blockchain. IETE Journal of Research. 2024;70(1):487–498. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2023.2233472

[15] Sanjith S, Thangaiah PRJ, Navamani JMA, Venkataramana A. Integration of blockchain technology for security and privacy enhancement in wireless body area network systems. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2023;16(41):3583–3590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v16i41.1610

[16] Singh AK, Kumar S. An efficient and secure CLAKA protocol for blockchain-aided wireless body area networks. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024;242:122740. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122740

[17] Bahache AN, Chikouche N, Akleylek S. Securing cloud-based healthcare applications with a quantum-resistant authentication and key agreement framework. Internet of Things. 2024;26:101200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101200

[18] Mansoor K, Afzal M, Iqbal W, Abbas Y, Mussiraliyeva S, Chehri A. PQCAIE: Post-quantum cryptographic authentication scheme for IoT-based e-health systems. Internet of Things. 2024;27:101228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101228

[19] SaberiKamarposhti M, Ng KW, Chua FF, Abdullah J, Yadollahi M, Moradi M, et al. Post-quantum healthcare: A roadmap for cybersecurity resilience in medical data. Heliyon. 2024;10(10):e31406. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31406

[20] Si-Ahmed A, Al-Garadi MA, Boustia N. Survey of machine learning-based intrusion detection methods for Internet of Medical Things. Applied Soft Computing. 2023;140:110227. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110227

[21] Alsolami T, Alsharif B, Ilyas M. Enhancing cybersecurity in healthcare: Evaluating ensemble learning models for intrusion detection in the Internet of Medical Things. Sensors. 2024;24(18):5937. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24185937

[22] Shaikh JA, Wang C, Muhammad WUS, Arshad MA, Owais M, Alnashwan RO, et al. RCLNet: An effective anomaly-based intrusion detection for securing the IoMT system. Frontiers in Digital Health. 2024;6:1467241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1467241

[23] Balhareth G, Ilyas M. Optimized intrusion detection for IoMT networks with tree-based machine learning and filter-based feature selection. Sensors. 2024;24(17):5712. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175712

[24] Khan A, Rizwan M, Bagdasar O, Alabdulatif A, Alamro S, Alnajim A. Deep learning-driven anomaly detection for IoMT-based smart healthcare systems. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 2024;141(3):2121–2141. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.054380

[25] Doménech Fons J, Martín Faus IV, Mhiri S, Pegueroles Vallés JR. Ensuring patient safety in IoMT: A systematic literature review of behavior-based intrusion detection systems. Internet of Things. 2024;28:101420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101420

[26] Sabrina F, Sohail S, Tariq UU. A review of post-quantum privacy preservation for IoMT using blockchain. Electronics. 2024;13(15):2962. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13152962

[27] Adil M, Ali A, Tin TT, Abulkasim H, Farouk A, Al-Kuwari S, et al. Quantum computing and the future of healthcare Internet of Things security: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2025;12(22):46316–46346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3605040

[28] Chaudhary AK, Patel RB, Jatav DS, Patel A, Mogili VB. IoT Based Deep Learning Framework for Continuous Healthcare Monitoring of Vital Signs. In 2025 International Conference on Intelligent and Secure Engineering Solutions (CISES) 2025 Aug 11 (pp. 1089-1094). IEEE. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISES66934.2025.11265584

Downloads

Published

19-10-2026

How to Cite

[1]
S. V. V. Ravi Teja and D. Latha, “Hybrid Post-Quantum Secure Wireless Healthcare Network with Audit Logging and AI-Based Intrusion Detection”, Journal of Computing and Data Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 193–206, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.71426/jcdt.v2.i2.pp193-206.