Smart Detection of Low Engagement in Students using Artificial Intelligence andBehavioral Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71426/jmt.v2.i2.pp317-326Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Data analysis, Student evaluation, Boolean logic.Abstract
This work aims to develop a basic artificial intelligence program that can identify the class's most indolent student. The purpose of the program is to examine specific behaviors that demonstrate a lack of effort. These include missing a lot of classes, arriving late, especially by more than twenty minutes, turning in assignments late, and receiving poor grades. The program evaluates each of these factors for each student and determines which ones fit all the criteria for being lazy. We start by entering each student's information. Their name, number of absences, tardiness on various days, final grade, and whether or not they turned in their work on time are all included in this. This makes it easier to evaluate each student's performance in relation to the class average. It determines whether the student meets each condition using straightforward checks, also known as Boolean logic, such as "true" or "false." A student is labeled lazy if they have missed more than four classes, been late more than twenty minutes at least once, failed to turn in assignments on time, and received a grade below the class average. The program creates a list of the lazy students after evaluating every one of them. It selects the student with the lowest score from this list. The term "laziest" is then applied to that student. The program indicates that no lazy student was found if no student satisfies every requirement. This prevents students from being unfairly judged if they only missed one or two things.
References
[1] Chen JW, Tsai MS, Hung CL. Towards an effective tool wear monitoring system with an AI model management platform. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN58382.2024.10774399
[2] Ashwitha M, Abinaya S. AI-powered disease prediction tool. In: Proceedings of the 2025 4th OPJU International Technology Conference (OTCON) on Smart Computing for Innovation and Advancement in Industry 5.0. IEEE; 2025. p. 1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/OTCON65728.2025.11070635
[3] Neeraj M, Daniel E, Durga S, Seetha S. Explainable multi-stage churn prediction using graph neural network in telecom sector. In: Proceedings of the 2025 8th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI). IEEE; 2025. p. 1100–1105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI65986.2025.11013438
[4] Bhuvaneswari R, Kumar P, Kaviya S. Explainable AI-driven heart disease prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Visual Analytics and Data Visualization (ICVADV). IEEE; 2025. p. 959–964. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVADV63329.2025.10961035
[5] Dwivedi R, Dave D, Naik H, Singhal S, Rana O, Patel P, Qian B, Wen Z, Shah T, Morgan G, Ranjan R. Explainable AI (XAI): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions. ACM Computing Surveys. 2023;55(9):1–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3561048
[6] Akther F, Begum M, Mahmud T, Boltayev A, Hanip A, Hossain MS. Streamlit-based AI for multi-disease prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI). IEEE; 2025. p. 1622–1628. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICI65870.2025.11069667
[7] Asal B, Demir MÖ. Enhancing software defect prediction through explainable AI: Integrating SHAP and LIME in a voting classifier framework. In: Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAP64064.2024.10710700
[8] Singh AP, Gupta G. Evaluation of the explainable AI-NLP framework for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE). IEEE; 2024. p. 181–185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3SE62002.2024.10593585
[9] Olu-Ajayi R, Alaka H, Sunmola F, Ajayi S, Mporas I. Statistical and artificial intelligence-based tools for building energy prediction: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2024;71:14733–14753. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3422821
[10] Lu J, Wu R, Li P. Multiple explanations for neural network-based dropout prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI). IEEE; 2024. p. 247–252. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAI61966.2024.10603374
[11] Mustaqeem M, Alam M, Mustajab S, Alshanketi F, Alam S, Shuaib M. Comprehensive bibliographic survey and forward-looking recommendations for software defect prediction: Datasets, validation methodologies, prediction approaches, and tools. IEEE Access. 2025;13:866–903. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3517419
[12] Pandey H, Pandey P, Gupta D. Airfoil self-noise prediction using machine learning and explainable AI. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems (RAICS). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/RAICS61201.2024.10689885
[13] Baker RSJD, Yacef K. The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining. 2009;1(1):3–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554658
[14] Thai-Nghe N, Horváth T, Schmidt-Thieme L. Factorization models for forecasting student performance. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM). 2011. p. 11–20. Available from: https://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2011/wp-content/uploads/proc/edm11_proceedings.pdf
[15] Hajdini A, Fazliu L, Gjoshi D. Comparative study of join algorithms in MySQL: Cross, inner, outer, and self joins. Journal of Computing and Data Technology. 2025;1(1):1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.71426/jcdt.v1.i1.pp1-9
[16] Dintakurthy Y, Innmuri RK, Vanteru A, Thotakuri A. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence in edge computing: A comprehensive review. Journal of Modern Technology. 2025;1(2):175–185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.71426/jmt.v1.i2.pp175-185
[17] Soma AK. Weighted graph clustering with PaCCo. In: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Emerging Systems and Intelligent Computing (ESIC). IEEE; 2025. p. 815–818. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ESIC64052.2025.10962723
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ortencia Laci, Keti Dervishi, Klea Vreto (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Modern Technology publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits others to copy, distribute, reproduce, remix, adapt, and build upon the published work for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the source. By publishing in the Journal of Modern Technology, all authors agree to these licensing terms as a condition of publication.